- Quick Comparison: HOLLYWOOD vs. HOLLYWOOD-S vs. HOLLYWOOD-MONO
- The Main Difference in One Sentence
- HOLLYWOOD: Best for Breathable Comfort and Natural Everyday Wear
- HOLLYWOOD-S: Best for Clients Who Prefer a Standard Front Contour
- HOLLYWOOD-MONO: Best for Durability, Support, and Fuller Volume
- Base Construction: Comfort vs. Structure
- Front Hairline: A Contour vs. Standard Contour
- Density: Natural 100% vs. Fuller 120%
- Attachment and Maintenance: Why the PU Perimeter Matters
- Which One Should Professionals Recommend?
- Final Recommendation
- Key Takeaways
- About the Author
- FAQs
HOLLYWOOD vs. HOLLYWOOD-S vs. HOLLYWOOD-MONO: Which Hair System Should You Choose?
- Quick Comparison: HOLLYWOOD vs. HOLLYWOOD-S vs. HOLLYWOOD-MONO
- The Main Difference in One Sentence
- HOLLYWOOD: Best for Breathable Comfort and Natural Everyday Wear
- HOLLYWOOD-S: Best for Clients Who Prefer a Standard Front Contour
- HOLLYWOOD-MONO: Best for Durability, Support, and Fuller Volume
- Base Construction: Comfort vs. Structure
- Front Hairline: A Contour vs. Standard Contour
- Density: Natural 100% vs. Fuller 120%
- Attachment and Maintenance: Why the PU Perimeter Matters
- Which One Should Professionals Recommend?
- Final Recommendation
- Key Takeaways
- About the Author
- FAQs

Choose HOLLYWOOD Lace for the most balanced hybrid hair system, HOLLYWOOD-S for lace comfort and practical hair replacement center handling, and HOLLYWOOD-MONO when the client needs more durability and structure. The main difference is base construction: lace improves comfort and front realism, PU helps attachment and cleanup, and mono adds strength for longer wear.
For hair replacement professionals and businesses, choosing the right stock hair system is not only about the base material. It is also about comfort, front hairline shape, durability, density, and how well the system matches different customer needs.
The Newtimes Hair HOLLYWOOD Series offers three practical options: HOLLYWOOD, HOLLYWOOD-MONO, and HOLLYWOOD-S. They share a similar professional professional-friendly design, but each one serves a slightly different customer type.
HOLLYWOOD is a balanced crowd-pleaser. HOLLYWOOD-S keeps the lace-and-PU design with a classic standard front contour. HOLLYWOOD-MONO is the stronger, fuller option for clients who want more density and longer wear.
Quick Comparison: HOLLYWOOD vs. HOLLYWOOD-S vs. HOLLYWOOD-MONO
| Feature | HOLLYWOOD | HOLLYWOOD-S | HOLLYWOOD-MONO |
| Base Material | French lace with thin clear PU around and 1/2″ French lace front | French lace with thin clear PU around and 1/2″ French lace front | Mono lace with clear PU perimeter and bleached Flex lace front |
| Front Contour | A shape | Standard | A shape |
| Suggested Yearly Plan | 4-6 pieces | 4-6 pieces | 2-4 pieces |
| Density Feel | Light/Medium, 100% | Light/Medium, 100% | Medium, 120% |
| Key Advantage | Breathable, natural, easy maintenance | Same lace comfort with standard front contour | Stronger mono base, longer-lasting choice |
| Best For | Clients who want comfort, airflow, and a natural mature hairline | Clients who prefer a classic standard front contour with lace comfort | Clients who want fuller volume and better durability |
The Main Difference in One Sentence
Choose HOLLYWOOD for breathable comfort, HOLLYWOOD-S for breathable comfort but with a standard front contour, and HOLLYWOOD-MONO for stronger durability and fuller volume.
That is the simplest way to explain the series to a client without burying him in base-material language.
Of course, professionals and hair replacement center owners still need the technical details. The base structure affects ventilation. The PU perimeter affects attachment and cleanup. The front lace affects realism. Density affects how believable the final look feels on the client’s face.
Check out Newtimes Hair’s Hybrid Hair Systems designed for various purposes.
HOLLYWOOD: Best for Breathable Comfort and Natural Everyday Wear
HOLLYWOOD is the most balanced option in the series. It uses a French lace top with a thin clear PU perimeter and a 1/2″ French lace front. This construction combines lightweight comfort, natural appearance, and efficient handling for hair replacement professionals.
The French lace top provides excellent breathability and a soft, natural feel against the scalp. The thin clear PU perimeter adds stability for attachment, removal, and maintenance, making it a practical choice for regular hair replacement center services.
At the front, HOLLYWOOD uses French lace with bleached knots. This helps create a more natural-looking hairline transition, especially in the front area where realism matters most.
Recommend HOLLYWOOD when the client:
- Wants a breathable lace hair system
- Prioritizes comfort over maximum durability
- Needs a natural-looking front hairline
- Prefers a mature A-contour hairline
- Wants a practical system for regular maintenance appointments
- Is looking for a natural 100% density effect
HOLLYWOOD is not the “strongest” model in this comparison. That is not its job.
Its job is to be the reliable comfort-first choice. For many everyday wearers, that is exactly what they need.
HOLLYWOOD
Hair Systems for Men with Thin Skin Perimeter and a Realistic Lace Front
HOLLYWOOD-S: Best for Clients Who Prefer a Standard Front Contour
HOLLYWOOD-S is the better choice when the client likes the idea of a lace hair system with a thin skin perimeter as HOLLYWOOD but prefers a standard front contour instead of an A-contour hairline.
This may sound like a small detail. It is not.
Hairline contour changes how the system frames the face. Some clients look better with a more mature A shape. Others prefer a more standard contour because it feels familiar, easier to style, or closer to the shape they are used to seeing in the mirror.
HOLLYWOOD-S keeps the practical logic of the Hollywood family: a French lace top for breathable comfort, a realistic lace front, and a thin clear PU perimeter for easier attachment and maintenance.
Its main difference from HOLLYWOOD is not the lace material, but the front contour design. HOLLYWOOD uses an A front contour, while HOLLYWOOD-S uses a standard front contour, allowing hair replacement centers to recommend different hairline shapes based on each client’s facial features and styling preference.
Recommend HOLLYWOOD-S when the client:
- Wants a lace hair system with a realistic front
- Prefers a standard front contour
- Wants 100% density rather than a fuller 120% look
- Needs PU support around the perimeter for easier professional handling
- Likes the Hollywood-style lace-and-skin structure but wants a different hairline shape
HOLLYWOOD-S is not about overwhelming the client with more features. It is about giving him the right hairline shape while keeping the comfort and practicality of a lace-front PU-perimeter system.
HOLLYWOOD-S
Hair Systems for Men with Thin Skin Perimeter and a Realistic Lace Front
HOLLYWOOD-MONO: Best for Durability, Support, and Fuller Volume
HOLLYWOOD-MONO is the strongest option of the three.
Its base uses mono lace with a clear PU perimeter and a bleached Flex lace front. Compared with HOLLYWOOD’s lace-dominant base, HOLLYWOOD-MONO gives the system more structure and resilience. It is made for clients who need better durability, not just the lightest possible feel.
The mono base gives the system stronger support. The clear PU perimeter helps with attachment and cleanup. The bleached Flex lace front keeps the hairline natural-looking, so the client does not have to trade all realism for durability.
Another major difference is density. HOLLYWOOD-MONO is made with 120% medium density, giving it a fuller appearance than the 100% density HOLLYWOOD and HOLLYWOOD-S models.
That fuller look can be a real advantage for the right client. But it should be recommended carefully. More density is not always more natural. A 120% system works best when the client’s face shape, remaining side hair, age, and styling preference can support the extra volume.
Recommend HOLLYWOOD-MONO when the client:
- Wants a stronger, more durable base
- Prefers fuller-looking hair
- Needs more base support than a lace-dominant system
- Is harder on his hair system during daily wear
- Wants a natural front but does not want the most delicate base
- Is suitable for a 120% density look
HOLLYWOOD-MONO is the upgrade choice. Not because every client needs it, but because some clients absolutely do.
HOLLYWOOD-MONO
Fine Mono Base Hair System with Clear PU Perimeter and Flex Lace Front for Wholesale
Base Construction: Comfort vs. Structure
The base is where the real product difference begins.
HOLLYWOOD is built around a French lace top, providing lightweight comfort and natural ventilation.
HOLLYWOOD-S follows the same French lace top and thin PU perimeter concept, but its key difference is the standard front contour.
HOLLYWOOD-MONO moves the client into a stronger construction. Mono lace gives more support than a lace-based top while maintaining a realistic French lace front.
Here is the practical hair replacement center logic:
- If the client complains about heat or heaviness, start with HOLLYWOOD.
- If the client wants a standard hairline contour, use HOLLYWOOD-S.
- If the client needs a tougher system with more volume, recommend HOLLYWOOD-MONO.
Simple. Useful. Easy to explain.
Front Hairline: A Contour vs. Standard Contour
The front contour can decide whether the hair system looks natural on the client’s face.
HOLLYWOOD has an A front contour, which works well for clients who want a mature, realistic male hairline. It avoids the overly straight front edge that can make a hair system look too obvious.
HOLLYWOOD-S is the standard contour option. This makes it useful when the client wants a more classic front shape or when the stylist believes a standard contour will blend better with the client’s face and styling habits.
HOLLYWOOD-MONO also uses an A-shaped front hairline, but the front is paired with a stronger mono base behind it. This gives clients a natural-looking front while still improving durability and density.
A good stylist should not treat contour as a minor specification. It changes the whole face.
Density: Natural 100% vs. Fuller 120%
Density is one of the easiest differences for clients to understand.
HOLLYWOOD and HOLLYWOOD-S are both positioned around a 100% density look. This is a natural choice for many men because it gives enough coverage without looking too thick or artificial.
HOLLYWOOD-MONO uses 120% density, which creates a fuller visual effect. This can be ideal for clients who want more volume, have thicker side hair, or prefer a stronger styled look.
But there is a catch.
A fuller system is only better when it suits the client. On some men, 120% density looks confident and natural. On others, it looks like the hair arrived before the person did.
So the recommendation should come back to the client’s face, age, side-hair density, and styling preference.
Attachment and Maintenance: Why the PU Perimeter Matters
All three systems use PU or thin skin support around the perimeter. This is one reason the Hollywood series is professional-friendly.
A PU perimeter gives stylists a cleaner area for tape or adhesive. It also makes removal and cleanup more manageable than working with a delicate lace-only edge everywhere.
For hair replacement centers, this matters because a hair system is not judged only on how it looks on day one. It is judged through repeated appointments, cleaning, reattachment, and client feedback.
HOLLYWOOD gives you comfort plus easy handling.
HOLLYWOOD-S gives you a standard contour with similar handling benefits.
HOLLYWOOD-MONO gives you stronger support while keeping the maintenance advantage of a PU perimeter.
That is a useful product family.
Which One Should Professionals Recommend?
The best recommendation depends on what the client is really asking for.
| Client Says | Best Recommendation | Why |
| “I want something light and breathable.” | HOLLYWOOD | French lace gives better airflow and comfort |
| “I want a natural hairline, but not too thick.” | HOLLYWOOD | French lace front and 100% density create a natural everyday look |
| “I prefer a standard front shape.” | HOLLYWOOD-S | It offers the standard contour option in the series |
| “I need something stronger.” | HOLLYWOOD-MONO | Mono lace gives better base support |
| “I want fuller hair.” | HOLLYWOOD-MONO | 120% density gives more volume |
| “I want something easier to maintain in the hair replacement center.” | Any of the three | PU perimeter helps with attachment and cleanup |
Final Recommendation
For most hair replacement centers, the Hollywood series works best when each product has a clear role.
HOLLYWOOD should be your comfort-first recommendation. It is breathable, natural-looking, and practical for everyday wear.
HOLLYWOOD-S should be your standard-contour alternative. It suits clients who want the lace-front Hollywood concept but prefer a more classic front shape.
HOLLYWOOD-MONO should be your durability and volume upgrade. It is the better option when the client needs stronger support, fuller density, and a more resilient base.
Do not sell all three as if they are almost the same.
They are not.
The right choice depends on what the client values most: comfort, contour, or durability.
Key Takeaways
- HOLLYWOOD is best for breathable comfort, a natural A-contour hairline, and everyday professional-friendly wear.
- HOLLYWOOD-S is best for clients who want lace comfort with a standard front contour.
- HOLLYWOOD-MONO is best for clients who need stronger support, better durability, and fuller 120% density.
- All three use PU or thin skin support around the perimeter, making attachment and maintenance easier for hair replacement centers.
- The smartest way to recommend the series is by client need, not by listing every stock specification.
About the Author

Julia Griffiths is a stylist, barber, educator, and Newtimes Hair author/reviewer with decades of hands-on salon experience. She began working in a barbershop at 13, later trained in ladies’ hairdressing and barbering, and opened Crosscuts Barbers at 27. Through Hair Revival Training, she now teaches CPD-accredited men’s hair system courses, bringing practical salon insight to her Newtimes Hair content.














.jpg)





